The model name should follow every specification into a comparison. Brother’s US PTP710BT page illustrates why: its heading and some specification fields identify the P-touch CUBE Plus, while a Main Features section discusses the CUBE XP. Copying the entire page into one product card would merge two model identities.

On 24 October 2026, the PTP710BT product page described CUBE Plus printing with tapes up to 24mm in its About section and maximum-width field. The Main Features section instead named CUBE XP and discussed 36mm-wide tapes. This is a report of what those page sections displayed, not a claim that PTP710BT supports both widths.

Use the model-specific document as a cross-check

The page’s linked CUBE Plus PT-P710BT brochure identifies that model and states a maximum tape width of 24mm. It bears a 2018 copyright. That supports keeping the model and width together; it does not make the old operating-system list a current compatibility statement.

Save the document title and applicable model alongside the field you use. A model-specific brochure is useful corroboration, but its age still matters for software, accessories and current commercial conditions.

A compact comparison card

• Identity: PTP710BT / P-touch CUBE Plus, with the source’s exact model label.
• Field: the particular specification being compared, such as maximum tape width.
• Evidence: the named page section and the corresponding model-specific document.
• Mismatch: the different model named in a neighbouring section, kept out of the product’s specification row.
• Unconfirmed: any current software or accessory question that the available material does not answer.

This method prevents a polished comparison table from becoming a composite product that the manufacturer has not described. It also makes the enquiry to a seller precise: ask for the exact printer model and the compatible supply or workflow, rather than a generic “CUBE” package.

Do not use a width figure as a print test

A maximum tape width does not tell us how a particular design will fit, how small text looks or whether the reader’s software environment works. Those are separate questions for a defined label and actual setup. A narrow label, an application-generated preview and a finished print should not be described as the same evidence.

No label was printed and no app or driver installed for this article. We did not verify a current price, stock position or local warranty. The page discrepancy is useful because it shows exactly where a comparison needs disciplined model matching; it is not a reason to invent a corrected specification for every field.

Related reading: Technology and the product-launch source checklist.